> > So is times() is broken in IA64, or is this an exception to Alan's
> > statement?
> yes it's broken; it needs to convert it to the original HZ (1024) and
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/times.html
In which there is a typo:
"Applications should use to determine the number of clock ticks
per second as it may vary from system to system"
Clearly the word "sysconf" is missing between "use" and "to" (sysconf()
*is* listed in the SEE ALSO section).
I thought that part of the reason Linus raised HZ from 100 to 1000
on x86 was to help flush out pre-historic programs that didn't
know about sysconf() [With the hope that results that are off by
an order of magnitude would be absurd enough to get notice].
> make the sysconf() function also return 1024
Making sysconf lie about the actual system tick sounds such a
bad idea on so many levels!
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
