On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 21:31 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> It's only too slow on swsusp. With Suspend2, I regularly suspend 1GB images on
> both my desktop and laptop machines. I agree that it might be slower on a
> 4200RPM laptop drive, but you also have to balance this against faulting the
> pages back in post resume (which will be slower because they're not
> compressed and contiguous then, though maybe not not as noticable if you're
> saving 75% of memory).
I'm one of those unlucky people with a 4200 RPM notebook drive, coupled
with a crappy P4 based Celeron CPU. By far, Suspend2 provides a better
user experience than swsusp, even when saving all of 700+ MB or RAM.
--
Bojan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]