On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:39:09 -0700 Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 21:33:37 -0400 Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> > On 7/7/06, Randy.Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:37:36 -0400 Jon Smirl wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patch removes tty_mutex and replaces it with a ref counted
> > > > tty_struct. A new spinlock, tty_lock, serializes tty
> > > > creation/destruction. This code thoroughly audits everyone taking
> > > > references to tty_struct and tracks them. I have been running it
> > > > locally for a few days without any issues.
> > > >
> > > > If there is a refcount problem it will trigger a WARN_ON. If you hit
> > > > one, defining DEBUG_TTY_REFCOUNT will provide plenty of debug info to
> > > > help locate the missing reference. I definitely found multiple locking
> > > > holes in the old tty_mutex code but they they look hard to hit.
> > > >
> > > > This is just a first step, if this code proves to be stable I'll do
> > > > another round of cleanup. There is room for a lot more work to be
> > > > done. Ultimately there may not even be a need for a tty refcount if
> > > > everything is locked correctly. But that is a big step and we should
> > > > take some smaller ones first.
> > > >
> > > > This is meant for mm until it gets some testing - I don't want to
> > > > break anyone's console. If gmail wraps it let me know and I'll send
> > > > you an attachment.
> > >
> > > It has one wrapped line in it but does not apply cleanly to
> > > 2.6.18-rc1 or to 2.6.17-mm6. What was it diffed against?
> > >
> > > ---
> > > ~Randy
> > >
> >
> > Diffed against the current git tree. Commits going into git keep
> > making it have fuzz but none of them have broken it.
>
> Which current git tree? www.kernel.org/git/ lists a whole bunch
> of them, then there are some not at kernel.org.
Apparently not to Linus's 2.6 git tree. I get:
> git pull
Already up-to-date.
and
linus-today> patch -p1 -b --dry-run < ~/tty-ref-count.patch
patching file drivers/char/tty_io.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 126 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 157.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1089.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 1183.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1193 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1202 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1209 with fuzz 1.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 1553 with fuzz 1.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 1630 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #12 FAILED at 1637.
Hunk #13 FAILED at 1667.
Hunk #14 FAILED at 1685.
Hunk #15 FAILED at 1711.
Hunk #16 FAILED at 1829.
Hunk #17 FAILED at 1858.
Hunk #18 FAILED at 1893.
Hunk #19 FAILED at 1918.
11 out of 27 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/char/tty_io.c.rej
patching file drivers/char/vc_screen.c
patching file drivers/char/vt.c
patching file drivers/net/ppp_async.c
patching file drivers/serial/serial_core.c
patching file drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
patching file fs/devpts/inode.c
patching file include/linux/tty.h
patching file kernel/exit.c
patching file kernel/fork.c
patching file kernel/sys.c
patching file security/selinux/hooks.c
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
