Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> >>  Pavel> I do not think suspend2 works on more machines than in-kernel
> >>  Pavel> swsusp. Problems are in drivers, and drivers are shared.
> >>
> >>  Pavel> That means that if you have machine where suspend2 works and
> >>  Pavel> swsusp does not, please tell me. I do not think there are many
> >>  Pavel> of them.
> >>
> >> Accept the facts -- for some reason, there is a fairly large user base
> >> that goes to all the bother of using suspend2, which requires
> >>     
> > ...
> >   
> >> That is a fact, and all the hand waving won't change it.
> >>     
> >
> > Users like suspend2 eye candy => swsusp must be unreliable?
> >   
> oh, come on. that's a pretty cheap argument. let me tell you i tried
> swsusp (admittedly a while ago) couldn't get it to run reliably on

Can you retry with recent version and generate proper bugreport if it
is still broken?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux