Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:09:39PM +0200, grundig wrote:
> You may ask "why not merge suspend2", but from an objective
> POV it's perfectly fine that some people asks "why don't
> suspend2 people try to improve swsusp instead of rewritting
> it? It may be easier to fix swsusp than replacint it with
> suspend2"

Suspend2 is an improvement on swsusp.  What Pavel wants is something
completely different and even less tested that suspend2 called
uswsusp.

  OG.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux