On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:47:35 -0700
Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:14:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > I have both reversion patches queued up but haven't heard from
> > anyone about anything.
>
> i saw that --- i don't think it's right, but it's not more wrong than
> having that merged as-is in the first place which i'll argue is wrong
> by virtue of the fact we run the quirk everywhere and apparently break
> things
>
> > I don't know if anyone's working on this bug.
>
> it's not forgotten, i'm waiting to hear back from people still.
> enabling ACPI *should* suffice, but for some people clearly it doesn't
> (there are claims VIA got their ACPI wrong so this might explain why
> it works for some people and not others)
>
> > Thursday is my subsystem-maintainer-spamming day, so the reverts
> > will be heading Gregwards today.
>
> like i said, i really don't think reverting the patches is technically
> correct, but given that i don't have adequate hardware to test against
> it might be the least painful option right now
Yes, it's a question of whose machines we choose to break.
It'd be great to get this thing nailed. Do the people who are out testing
things need re-asking?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
