Re: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/07/06, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
Currently, using an undeclared function gives a compile warning, but it
can lead to a nasty to debug runtime stack corruptions if the prototype
of the function is different from what gcc guessed.

With -Werror-implicit-function-declaration we are getting an immediate
compile error instead.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Makes good sense. It gets my vote.
Thanks Adrian.

--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux