On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:31:15 +0200, Arjan van de Ven said: > On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 01:18 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: w > > Yes. Although at least part of that display is per architecture > > so we may be able to get away with a little more. > > irqbalance uses the per column data for it's work.. please don't kill > the information or format. Does irqbalance have a snowball's chance of doing anything sane on the moby-CPU moby-IRQ boxes under discussion here? How well does it do when faced with 10K IRQs on 1K CPUs?
Attachment:
pgpJcZf04VYEN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- 2.6.17-mm6
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- From: "Keith Mannthey" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- From: "Keith Mannthey" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- 2.6.17-mm6
- Prev by Date: [2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS
- Next by Date: __pa() versus virt_to_phys()
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- Index(es):
 |