Re: [PATCH] audit syscall classes

[Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>]

On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 06:00:02PM +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> commit b915543b46a2aa599fdd2169e51bcfd88812a12b
> tree 8025e6654829d4c245b5b6b6f47a84543ebffb7b
> parent 6e5a2d1d32596850a0ebf7fb3e54c0d69901dabd
> author Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Sat, 01 Jul 2006 11:56:16 -0400
> committer Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Sat, 01 Jul 2006 15:44:10 -0400
> 
> [PATCH] audit syscall classes
> 
> Allow to tie upper bits of syscall bitmap in audit rules to kernel-defined
> sets of syscalls.  Infrastructure, a couple of classes (with 32bit counterparts
> for biarch targets) and actual tie-in on i386, amd64 and ia64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> 
>  arch/i386/kernel/Makefile               |    1 
>  arch/i386/kernel/audit.c                |   23 ++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/ia64/ia32/Makefile                 |    1 
>  arch/ia64/ia32/audit.c                  |   11 +++++++++
>  arch/ia64/kernel/Makefile               |    1 
>  arch/ia64/kernel/audit.c                |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86_64/ia32/Makefile               |    3 ++
>  arch/x86_64/ia32/audit.c                |   11 +++++++++
>  arch/x86_64/kernel/Makefile             |    1 
>  arch/x86_64/kernel/audit.c              |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/asm-generic/audit_change_attr.h |   18 ++++++++++++++
>  include/asm-generic/audit_dir_write.h   |   14 +++++++++++
>  include/linux/audit.h                   |    7 +++++
>  kernel/auditfilter.c                    |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  14 files changed, 188 insertions(+)

Excuse my ignorance, but this looks like every architecture needs to add
something like this. If it is needed, is there some easy way to test the
implementation?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/