Re: [PATCH] mm: moving dirty pages balancing to pdfludh entirely

Ananiev, Leonid I writes:
 > I have added proposed by Nikita lines
 > 		if (pdflush_operation(background_writeout, 0))
 >                 writeback_inodes(&wbc);
 > and tested it with iozone. The throughput is 50-53 MB/sec. It is less
 > than 74-105 MB/sec results sent earlier.

If this change has any effect at all, then maximal number of pdflush
threads has been started. But there is only one device, so what are
these threads doing?

 > 
 > Leonid

Nikita.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- RE: [PATCH] mm: moving dirty pages balancing to pdfludh entirely
  - From: "Ananiev, Leonid I" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] uninline init_waitqueue_*() functions
Next by Date: Re: [Patch][RFC] Disabling per-tgid stats on task exit in taskstats
Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH] mm: moving dirty pages balancing to pdfludh entirely
Next by thread: RE: [PATCH] mm: moving dirty pages balancing to pdfludh entirely
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]