On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:24:22AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Sure, the driver will not be used on that architecture. But there is some
> > benefit in being able to cross-compile that driver on other architectures
> > anyway. Sometimes it will pick up missed #includes, sometimes printk
> > mismatches, various other assumptions which might be OK for x86 right now
> > but which might cause problems in the future.
>
> Should we have a NONNATIVE config option analogous to
> EXPERIMENTAL, so that it could be expressed as
> depends on AGP && (X86 || NONNATIVE)
> Seems to express the actual intentions.
Gah, that would be awful. It'd end up riddled through kconfigs everywhere.
It's also not really buying anything more than
(X86 || !X86) , at which point, they cancel each other out ;)
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
