J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 08:24:29AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>>Theodore Tso wrote:
>>
>>>Some of the ideas which have been tossed about include:
>>>
>>> * nanosecond timestamps, and support for time beyond the 2038
>>
>>The 2nd one is probably more urgent than the first. I can see a general
>>benefit from timestamp in ms, beyond that seems to be a specialty
>>requirement best provided at the application level rather than the bits
>>of a trillion inodes which need no such thing.
>
>
> What's urgently needed for NFS (and I suspect for most other
> applications demanding higher timestamps) isn't really nanosecond
> precision so much as something that's guaranteed to increase whenever
> the file changes.
Yes please!
http://lkml.org/lkml/2001/10/8/18
Pádraig.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
