Re: [CPUFREQ] Fix implicit declarations in ondemand.

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:43:05AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
 > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 02:36 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > > On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 05:22:54 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
 > > 
 > > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function ‘dbs_check_cpu’:
 > > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:238: error: implicit declaration
 > > of function ‘jiffies64_to_cputime64’
 > > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:239: error: implicit declaration
 > > of function ‘cputime64_sub’
 > 
 > > > +#include <asm/cputime.h>
 > 
 > > But kernel_stat.h already includes cputime.h, as does sched.h, and
 > > pretty much everything pulls in sched.h.
 > > 
 > > It's not bad to avoid a dependency upon nested includes, but I do
 > > wonder how this error came about?? 
 > 
 > asm-powerpc/cputime.h doesn't declare jiffies64_to_cputime64() or
 > cputime64_sub()

The curious part is why it isn't picking up the definition from asm-generic
like x86-64 & friends do.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/