On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 02:50:32 +1000
Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>Ok. Will put a #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM around that statement and the
> >>>following one.
> >>
> >>That will take the patchset up to 27 new ifdefs. Is there a way of improving
> >>that?
> >
> >
> > Ideas are welcome. I can put some of the tests for zones together into one
> > big #ifdef in mmzone.h but otherwise this is going to be difficult.
>
> I don't think there's much point. They all look pretty straightforward,
> and if you try doing something fancy it might just make it more fragile
> or harder to read.
>
just one point.
I'm not sure dropping "printing HIGHMEM statistics" stuff is good or not.
It is shown in /proc/meminfo even if CONFIG_HIGHMEM=n now. this will change look
of user interface a bit. but maybe not so important ....
-Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
