Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20

[Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>]

On Tuesday 04 July 2006 13:41, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> >> I encountered the same problem on a dual core opteron equipped with a
> >> broadcom NIC (tg3) under 2.4. It could receive 1 Mpps when using TSC
> >> as the clock source, but the time jumped back and forth, so I changed
> >> it to 'notsc', then the performance dropped dramatically to around the
> >> same value as above with one CPU saturated. I suspect that the clock
> >> precision is needed by the tg3 driver to correctly decide to switch to
> >> polling mode, but unfortunately, the performance drop rendered the
> >> solution so much unusable that I finally decided to use it only in
> >> uniprocessor with TSC enabled.
> >
> > 2.6 is more clever at this than 2.4. In particular it does the timestamp
> > for each packet only when actually needed, which is relativelt rare.
> >
> > Old experiences do not always apply to new kernels.
> 
> Note, that I experinced this problem on 2.6.
> 
> Actually the change happens between kernel version 2.6.15 and 2.6.16.

The timestamp optimizations are older. Don't remember the exact release,
but earlier 2.6.

> And  
> is a result of Andi's changes to arch/x86_64/Kconfig and 
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig, which "allows/activates" the use of the timer on 
> x86_64.

Not sure what you mean here?

2.6.18 will likely be more aggressive at using the TSC on i386 on
Intel systems where possible, but x86-64 did this already for a long time. 
When x86-64 uses non TSC then it's because using the TSC is not safe.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/