Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?

[Jeff Bailey <jbailey@ubuntu.com>]

Le lundi 03 juillet 2006 à 20:46 +0200, maximilian attems a écrit :
> well but busybox is big nowadays and generally compiled against glibc.
> i'm quite eager to kick busybox out of default Debian initramfs-tools
> to have an klibc only default initramfs. those tools are needed atm,
> and there is not enough yet. afaik suse adds sed on klibc with a minimal
> patch and we'd liked to have stat, kill and readlink on klibc-utils.
> 
> how about busybox on klibc?

I made a brief attempt to do busybox on klibc before klcc was working
right for me.  I should try that again.  In Ubuntu, we already do a
separate build pass of busybox to get just the features that we want, it
would be easy to play with this.

I'll let you know.  It'll take me a couple days - between travelling and
the long weekend, I'm a bit behind.

Tks,
Jeff Bailey

-- 
* Canonical Ltd * Ubuntu Service and Support * +1 514 691 7221 *

Linux for Human Beings.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=