[OT] Re: Driver for Microsoft USB Fingerprint Reader

[Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>]

On Monday 03 July 2006 11:04, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
[snip]
> I hate when vendors like ATI, Conexant and UPEK publish binary drivers
> without publishing the chipset spec... They should decide whether
> their IP is on the software part or on the hardware part, if it is on
> the hardware part, they are making money in selling the hardware. If
> it is on the software part, there is no reason why not providing the
> information for others to write software to work with the primitive
> hardware. So in either case there should be full hardware interface
> disclosure.

Personally, I'm annoyed that Reverse Engineering is so frowned upon that 
stupid laws get passed to block it, and that the practice is misrepresented 
by the media.

I think degree programs for Computer Science and Engineering at Universities 
across (at least) Europe should run reverse engineering courses for those 
interested.

Assembler and the ability to read machine code is becoming a forgotten skill, 
and it's the only way that we can help negate vendors' "anti-choice, 
anti-consumer" attitude.

-- 
Cheers,
Alistair.

Final year Computer Science undergraduate.
1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/