Miles Lane wrote:
Well, I see that Andrew has accepted (mm5) the -fno-stack-protector patch for the Makefile, but klibc remains unpatched (scripts/Kbuild.klibc and usr/klibc/arch/i386/MCONFIG). Would the right person in this dialog submit those changes to Andrew?
The fix is in my private tree, but given that we're in a merge window, I don't want to push it out right now until I've been able to figure out why an unrelated change cause make to spew warning messages.
-hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] consistently use MAX_ERRNO in __syscall_return
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 7/8] inode-diet: Use a union for i_blocks and i_size, i_rdev and i_devices
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
- Index(es):
 |