In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 15:37:18 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > to avoid such mistakes in the future, the suggested solution is to
> > make user_mode() on i386 consistent with the generic expectation and
> > make it detect any user mode execution context, that is, it should
> > take the role of user_mode_vm() and a new user_mode_novm() is
> > introduced for the i386 specific cases where v86 mode can be excluded.
> > in short, the patch simply does a
> >
> > user_mode_vm -> user_mode
> > user_mode -> user_mode_novm
> >
> > substitution as appropriate.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: PaX Team <[email protected]>
>
> agreed!
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Please make that second one
user_mode_novm86
Otherwise people might think it means "user mode no virtual memory."
--
Chuck
"You can't read a newspaper if you can't read." --George W. Bush
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
