Re: 2.6.17-mm4 + hostap + pcmcia + lockdep -- possible recursive locking detected -- (af_callback_keys + sk->sk_family#3){-.-?}, at: [<c119d8db>] sock_def_readable+0x15/0x69

* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> * Miles Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > I have patches for hostap, pcmcia and lockdep applied to this kernel. 
> > These patches are the ones resulting from several recent message 
> > threads. I just noticed this in my kernel log:
> > 
> > [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> > ---------------------------------------------
> 
> ok, lockdep should allow same-class read-lock recursion too, because 
> it's used by real code and is being relied upon. Could you try the patch 
> below? [...]

the patches are also included in the latest -mm5 combo patch at:

  http://redhat.com/~mingo/lockdep-patches/lockdep-combo-2.6.17-mm5.patch

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.17-mm4 + hostap + pcmcia + lockdep -- possible recursive locking detected -- (af_callback_keys + sk->sk_family#3){-.-?}, at: [<c119d8db>] sock_def_readable+0x15/0x69
  - From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>

References:
- 2.6.17-mm4 + hostap + pcmcia + lockdep -- possible recursive locking detected -- (af_callback_keys + sk->sk_family#3){-.-?}, at: [<c119d8db>] sock_def_readable+0x15/0x69
  - From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-mm4 + hostap + pcmcia + lockdep -- possible recursive locking detected -- (af_callback_keys + sk->sk_family#3){-.-?}, at: [<c119d8db>] sock_def_readable+0x15/0x69
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]