Re: [PATCH 10/17] 2.6.17.1 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch

On Friday 30 June 2006 18:02, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Andi,
> 
> As a first step, I am looking at implementing a TIF_DEBUG
> for x86-64. AFAIK, debug registers must not be inherited on
> fork().

Why not?  Especially for threads you probably want them
in the new thread too.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 10/17] 2.6.17.1 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch
    • From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 10/17] 2.6.17.1 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch
    • From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 10/17] 2.6.17.1 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 10/17] 2.6.17.1 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch
    • From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0 of 39] ipath - bug fixes, performance enhancements,and portability improvements
• Next by Date: Re: Proposal and plan for ext2/3 future development work
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 10/17] 2.6.17.1 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 10/17] 2.6.17.1 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]