On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:37:58PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> As you can see, the lock validator can easily cover completely new lock
> types like sk_lock too, as long as the new lock type has some
> minimalistic "works like a lock" properties. (such as owner-does-unlock)
>
> later on i'll try the same cleanup for the mutex code too - it should be
> possible. (that way the implementation of complex lock types can be
> lock-validator checked too)
Yes, this looks very nice. Thanks!
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
