Andrew,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:17:08PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Does someone have something else to propose?
> >
> > If not, what is your opinion of the two approaches above?
> >
>
> The first approach should be fine - we do that in lots of places, such as
> in core_sys_select().
>
Ok, that's good to know. I looked at the stack consumption on x86 and it
is comparable to what you do for core_sys_select().
> Applications mut be calling this thing at a heck of a rate for kfree()
> overhead to matter. I trust CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB wasn't turned on...
That was using a micro-benchmark to stress certain paths in perfmon.
CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB was not turned on.
Thanks.
--
-Stephane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
