Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-R} usage.

* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> hm, is this all the log output you got? In particular the printouts of 
> where various lock-class state changing events happened that are 
> important too. Could you send me the whole dmesg?

sorry, i take this back - the messages are complete.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-R} usage.
    • From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-R} usage.
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-R} usage.
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.17-mm4 -- BUG: illegal lock usage! -- illegal {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage.
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-R} usage.
• Next by thread: [patch] lockdep, annotate slocks: turn lockdep off for them
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]