Re: [2.6 patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n

On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 21:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch was already sent on:
> - 26 Jun 2006
> - 27 Apr 2006
> - 19 Apr 2006
> - 11 Apr 2006
> - 10 Mar 2006
> - 29 Jan 2006
> - 21 Jan 2006 

3 days ago?  That seems a bit silly.  Why didn't you just ping Andrew on
it?

Andrew, what's the status of this?  Can we get an ACK or a NACK before
this starts getting reposted every day? ;-)

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [2.6 patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Patch][RFC] Disabling per-tgid stats on task exit in taskstats
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 39 of 39] IB/ipath - use streaming copy in RDMA interrupt handler to reduce packet loss
• Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]