Re: [PATCH] (Longhaul 1/5) PCI: Protect bus master DMA from Longhaul by rw semaphores

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rafał Bilski wrote:
It needs there to be no bus mastering occuring at the time
of a CPU speed transition. Though I'm unable to find the part that me
ntions
this in the specs I have right now.

Dave

"Once this is set, the processor will switch to the
value in [26:23] on the next AUTOHALT transition. The duration of the A
UTOHALT
should be >=1ms to ensure the CPU's internal PLL is resynchronized. F
or AUTOHALT, this means interrupts must be disabled except for the time ti
ck, which should be reset to >=1ms. Care must be taken to avoid other sys
tem events that could interfere with this operation. A few examples are snooping, NMI, INIT, SMI and FLUSH."

For CPU's with Longhaul MSR this time is equal to 200us.

That really is a rather horrible design on their part. Who the hell at VIA thought this was a good idea?

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from [email protected]
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux