Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jun 29, 2006 11:10 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jun 28, 2006 17:50 +0200, Johann Lombardi wrote:
ext2/ext3_dir_entry_2 has a 16-bit entry(rec_len) and it would overflow
with 64KB blocksize. This patch prevent from overflow by limiting
rec_len to 65532.
Having a max rec_len of 65532 is rather unfortunate, since the dir
blocks always need to filled with dir entries. 65536 - 65532 = 4, and
the minimum ext3_dir_entry size is 8 bytes. I would instead make this
maybe 64 bytes less so that there is room for a filename in the "tail"
dir_entry.
Then why not introduce a little symmetry by making max rec_len 2**15 and
treat big directory blocks as an array of smaller ones? I dimly recall
the page-cache oriented Ext2 dir code already does this.
I have no objection to this at all, but I think it will lead to a slightly
more complex implementation. We even discussed in the distant past to
make large directories a series of 4kB "chunks", for fs blocksize >= 4kB.
This has negative implications for large filenames because the internal
free space fragmentation is high, but has the advantage that it might
eventually still be usable if we can get blocksize > PAGE_SIZE.
The difficulty is that when freeing dir entires you would have to be
concerned with a merging a dir_entry that is spanning the middle
of a 2^16 block.
That is easy, just don't let an entry span subblocks by not letting
delete merge past the end of a subblock, just a minor tweak. New block
initialization needs an outer loop on subblocks and that's it, I think.
Regards,
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]