Re: [klibc 07/31] i386 support for klibc

Hi,

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> The i386 ones are a bit special... usually the reason I have added libgcc
> functions is that on some architectures, gcc has various problems linking with
> libgcc in some configurations.

If gcc has problems to link its own libgcc you really have a serious 
problem...
The standard libgcc may not be as small as you like, but it still should 
be the first choice. If there is a problem with it, the gcc people do 
accept patches.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [klibc 07/31] i386 support for klibc
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [klibc 00/31] klibc as a historyless patchset (updated and reorganized)
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [klibc 07/31] i386 support for klibc
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [klibc 07/31] i386 support for klibc
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [klibc 07/31] i386 support for klibc
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: USB driver for Sierra Wireless EM5625/MC5720 1xEVDO modules
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] SELinux: Extend task_kill hook to handle signals sent by AIO completion
• Previous by thread: Re: [klibc 07/31] i386 support for klibc
• Next by thread: Re: [klibc 07/31] i386 support for klibc
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]