On Thursday 29 June 2006 00:46, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2006-06-29 00:37:57, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Thursday 29 June 2006 00:24, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > Okay, can I get some details? Like how much memory does system > > > > > have, what stress test causes the failure? > > > > > > > > The machine has 1GB of RAM, filling it up beyond 500MB, maybe 600MB > > > > usually made swsusp a problem. I'd need to close apps then to be able > > > > to suspend. > > > > > > I'm pretty sure I do suspending with most of RAM full. You have > > > big-enough swap partition, right? > > > > 1 GB, it might not be completely empty though. I probably only hit swsusp > > limit much earlier than suspend2's (which after 34 suspend/resume cycles > > and heavy use in between I did not hit yet). I'll try to see what I can do, it might take some time though. Quite busy at the moment and preparing for vacation, lucky me. :-) And to be honest, since suspend2 works perfectly well here, it's not extremely high on my list of priorities (talking about scratching an itch), swsusp just misses too much stuff I heavily rely upon, and I'm used to for years. Sad enough I have to go through this again, after having helped out with testing suspend2 for more than three years. > Okay, can we get bugzilla.kernel.org report? (assigned-to me) > > This really should not happen, and I did not see swsusp fail like that > for quite a long time. I _could_ make it fail with make -j on kernel, > and similar crazy loads, but on nothing reasonable. > > dmesg from failed run would be nice, too. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nothing ever becomes real until it is experienced. - John Keats
Attachment:
pgpDqiB9k12xq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm)
- From: Sebastian Kügler <[email protected]>
- Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm
- Prev by Date: Re: [git pull] Input update for 2.6.17
- Next by Date: Re: the creation of boot_cpu_init() is wrong and accessing uninitialised data
- Previous by thread: Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm)
- Next by thread: Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm)
- Index(es):
 |