>>>>>I looked at
>>>>>http://www.kernel-api.org/docs/online/2.6.17/da/dab/structsk__buff.html
>>>>>
>>>>>and you apparently ignore kernel-doc for structs. Cf.
>>>>>include/linux/skbuff.h:177 ff.
>>>>
>>>>There are several problems. The one you describe is probably caused by a
>>>>blank line between the struct and the related comment. Doxygen doesn't
>>>>recognize it correctly (and simply ignores the comment).
>>>
>>>No blank line in this case.
>>
>>Oh, yes, there is a blank line between the comment and the struct. It's
>>a pitty that someone put much effort into writing a usable description,
>>which is then not seen. Anyway, should we find all such occurences in
>>the kernel tree and fix them, or make a workaround for doxygen?
>
>
> Which struct are we talking about here? I missed it.
>
> I guess the easy answer is Both.
> However, I'm working on fixing up the kernel tree, so sending
> patches is correct IMO.
>
We are currently talking about struct sk_buff. And there _is_ a single
blank line which avoids to make a relation between the struct and the
comment above.
Lukas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
