Andrew Morton wrote:
This is caused by the vsprintf() changes. Right now, if you do
snprintf(buf, 4, "1111111111111");
the memory at `buf' gets [31 31 31 31 00], which is not good.
This'll plug it, but I didn't check very hard whether it still has any
off-by-ones, or if breaks the intent of Jeremy's patch. I think it's OK..
Damn. This patch doesn't look right; the intent is that 'end' point to
just beyond the formatted string. I'm pretty sure I tested this, since
its the most obvious test. Clearly not enough. I'll look into it.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
