On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 11:47 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ar Mer, 2006-06-28 am 10:43 +0200, ysgrifennodd Arjan van de Ven:
> > > I would hope not; it's a pretty big regression for the telco space
> > > (which really wants 1 or 2 msec delays) so I hope/assume all the
> > > enterprise distributions (which ia64 specially cares about) stick to the
> > > old 1024 value...
> >
> > 250 is also really bad for multimedia people. They would much rather
> > have 300 than 250 as it divides nicely by 50 and by 60 for frame rates.
>
> yup I know; I proposed that back when this was discussed but lost that
> argument ;(
Maybe try again? I think we were not aware of that issue when the patch
was submitted. And we had trouble following arguments in the flood of
messages that followed.
You could also simply add a HZ choice of 300.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
