Re: [patch] lockdep: special s390 print_symbol() version

On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 05:11 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:06:35 +0200
> Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Martin made me just aware of __builtin_extract_return_addr() which will
> > do the trick as well and avoids adding yet another ifdef.
> 
> Does gcc-3.2 support that?

It was present in every version of gcc we used, even 2.95.3 had it.

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch] lockdep: special s390 print_symbol() version
  - From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] lockdep: special s390 print_symbol() version
  - From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] lockdep: special s390 print_symbol() version
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH]microcode update driver rewrite - takes 2
Next by Date: Re: [patch] lockdep: special s390 print_symbol() version
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] lockdep: special s390 print_symbol() version
Next by thread: Re: [patch] lockdep: special s390 print_symbol() version
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]