On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:17:27 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:50:36 -0700
> Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Since the last revision, the locking in faccessat() and
> > > > mnt_is_readonly() has been changed to fix a race which might have
> > > > caused a false-negative mount-is-readonly return when faccessat()
> > > > is called while another two processes are racing to make a mount
> > > > readonly.
> > > >
> > > umm, what's it all for?
> >
> > Mostly for vserver, for now. They allow a filesystem to be r/w, but
> > have r/o views into it. This is really handy so that every vserver can
> > use a common install but still allow the administrator to update it.
>
> OK. That makes it one of those features which stays in -mm until we work
> out what we're going to do about containers/vserver/etc.
>
> Unless there's something else which needs it?
>
> This is all rather important info, you know. It should be presented
> front-and-centre in [patch 0/N]. In detail...
TPP says not to use patch 0/N.... !!?!!?!?!?
so which way do you want it?
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
