On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 16:54 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 14:39 -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:14 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
<snip>
> > > Is there a reason why the # of listeners part is removed (basically the
> > > LISTEN/IGNORE) ? and why as part of this patch ?
> >
> > Michael Kerrisk had some objections to LISTEN/IGNORE and I've been
> > looking into making a connector function that would replace them. They
> > exist primarily to improve performance by avoiding the memory allocation
> > in cn_netlink_send() when there are no listeners.
>
> If it not related this bug, can you please separate them.
>
> <snip>
OK, I'll separate it for the next submission.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
