Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] Process events biarch bug: New process events connector value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 16:54 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 14:39 -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:14 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
<snip>

> > > Is there a reason why the # of listeners part is removed (basically the
> > > LISTEN/IGNORE) ? and why as part of this patch ?
> > 
> > 	Michael Kerrisk had some objections to LISTEN/IGNORE and I've been
> > looking into making a connector function that would replace them. They
> > exist primarily to improve performance by avoiding the memory allocation
> > in cn_netlink_send() when there are no listeners.
> 
> If it not related this bug, can you please separate them.
> 
> <snip>

OK, I'll separate it for the next submission.

Cheers,
	-Matt Helsley

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux