Hi!
> > uswsusp is a great idea, really.. I love it.. but suspend2 is here, it
> > works, it's stable and it's now. Why continue to deprive the mainstream of
> > these features because "uswsusp should".. as yet it doesn't.. and when it
> > does then we can phase out the currently stable, working alternative that
> > has all these features that uswsusp _will_ have, after it's had them for a
> > year or so and its been proven stable. Not only that, I'll be happy to
> > migrate over to it. Until then however, you can pry suspend2.. cold,
> > dead.. blah blah..
>
> Given the above explanation, it's obvious that I'm an outside watcher now,
> but if swsusp2 success rate is clearly higher than the standard version,
> then I'd also strongly advocate this direction since, quite frankly,
I do not think suspend2 works on more machines than in-kernel
swsusp. Problems are in drivers, and drivers are shared.
That means that if you have machine where suspend2 works and swsusp
does not, please tell me. I do not think there are many of them.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
