Re: [PATCH 2/7] bootmem: mark link_bootmem() as part of the __init section

["Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>]

2006/6/27, Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 14:53 +0200, Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/bootmem.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/bootmem.c b/mm/bootmem.c
> > index d213fed..d0a34fe 100644
> > --- a/mm/bootmem.c
> > +++ b/mm/bootmem.c
> > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ unsigned long __init bootmem_bootmap_pag
> >  /*
> >   * link bdata in order
> >   */
> > -static void link_bootmem(bootmem_data_t *bdata)
> > +static void __init link_bootmem(bootmem_data_t *bdata)
> >  {
> >       bootmem_data_t *ent;
> >       if (list_empty(&bdata_list)) {
>
> Looks sane.  Just curious, did you do any wider audit in bootmem.c for
> more of these?

I checked that all functions in bootmem.c belong to the __init section.

--
              Franck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/