Re: [RFC][patch 1/4] Network namespaces: cleanup of dev_base list use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Kirill Korotaev ([email protected]):
> >>>>Cleanup of dev_base list use, with the aim to make device list 
> >>>>per-namespace.
> >>>>In almost every occasion, use of dev_base variable and dev->next pointer
> >>>>could be easily replaced by for_each_netdev loop.
> >>>>A few most complicated places were converted to using
> >>>>first_netdev()/next_netdev().
> >>>
> >>>As a proof of concept patch this is ok.
> >>>As a real world patch this is much too big, which prevents review.
> >>>Plus it takes a few actions that are more than replace just
> >>>iterators through the device list.
> >>
> >>Mmm, actually it is a whole changeset and should go as a one patch. I 
> >>didn't
> >>find it to be big and my review took only 5-10mins..
> >>I also don't think that mailing each driver maintainer is a good idea.
> >>Only if we want to make some buzz :)
> >
> >
> >Thanks for supporting my case.  You reviewed it and missed the obvious 
> >typo.
> >I do agree that a patchset doing it all should happen at once.
> This doesn't support anything. e.g. I caught quite a lot of bugs after 
> Ingo Molnar, but this doesn't make his code "poor". People are people.

Exactly - people are people, and they will do a better review of a
well-constructed set of small patches than of one large patch.  Eyes
glaze over, it just happens.

-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux