Quoting Kirill Korotaev ([email protected]):
> >>>>Cleanup of dev_base list use, with the aim to make device list
> >>>>per-namespace.
> >>>>In almost every occasion, use of dev_base variable and dev->next pointer
> >>>>could be easily replaced by for_each_netdev loop.
> >>>>A few most complicated places were converted to using
> >>>>first_netdev()/next_netdev().
> >>>
> >>>As a proof of concept patch this is ok.
> >>>As a real world patch this is much too big, which prevents review.
> >>>Plus it takes a few actions that are more than replace just
> >>>iterators through the device list.
> >>
> >>Mmm, actually it is a whole changeset and should go as a one patch. I
> >>didn't
> >>find it to be big and my review took only 5-10mins..
> >>I also don't think that mailing each driver maintainer is a good idea.
> >>Only if we want to make some buzz :)
> >
> >
> >Thanks for supporting my case. You reviewed it and missed the obvious
> >typo.
> >I do agree that a patchset doing it all should happen at once.
> This doesn't support anything. e.g. I caught quite a lot of bugs after
> Ingo Molnar, but this doesn't make his code "poor". People are people.
Exactly - people are people, and they will do a better review of a
well-constructed set of small patches than of one large patch. Eyes
glaze over, it just happens.
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
