On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:24:24AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 23:58 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This patch removes some code that is dead code after the
> > "Remove read/write _ecc variants" patch that went into Linus' tree.
>
> Holy cow, are you even remotly knowing what you are doing ?
>
> Removing the xxx_ecc function pointers from the mtd structs does not
> remove the fundamental requirement of ECC for NAND FLASH.
>
> I'm just waiting for the follow up patches which remove nand_ecc and the
> reed solomon library.
>...
nand_ecc isn't dead code.
But if I do understand correctly, you have pending patches to let the
code your patch made dead code and my patch would have removed be used
again?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
