Re: make PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ

> Well, some hardware can probably support write-only, and such support
> can be useful for "weird" applications, such as just-in-time
> compilers, etc.

it also makes sense for PCI MMIO mappings..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: make PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ
    • From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
  • Re: make PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ
    • From: Jason Baron <[email protected]>
  • Re: make PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: make PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ
    • From: Jason Baron <[email protected]>
  • Re: make PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: make PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ
    • From: "Ulrich Drepper" <[email protected]>
  • Re: make PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] binfmt: turn MAX_ARG_PAGES into a sysctl tunable
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] binfmt: turn MAX_ARG_PAGES into a sysctl tunable
• Previous by thread: Re: make PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ
• Next by thread: Re: make PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]