On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:04:08 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It's a general problem - our reviewing resources do not have the
> > capacity to cover our coding resources. This is especially the case
> > on filesystems. We'd have merged (a very different) reiser4 a year
> > ago if things were in balance.
>
> and just this very minute what gets merged upstream? A chunk of OCFS2
oh yes, running a git tree is a wonderful way to avoid code review.
We ought to require that people get each diff onto a useful mailing list
for review before sending them upstream. And not in batches of 100 five
minutes before sending the pull request.
oh, and we ought to require that people send patches upstream more than
fifteen minutes after they wrote them.
<starts to calm down>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
