* Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Btw., i have just taken a 5 minute tour into XFS, and i found at
> > least 5 other problems with the XFS code that are similar in nature
> > to the ones you pointed out.
>
> that's no reason to merge even more junk
the GFS2 ones were immediately addressed, 28 minutes and 27 seconds
after they were pointed out:
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:57:56 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: GFS2 and DLM
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:26:23 +0100
From: Steven Whitehouse <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: GFS2 and DLM
> > (mostly useless wrappers around Linux functionality) Isnt this whole
> > episode highly hypocritic to begin with?
>
> lets not start calling names please...
well, i guess it's way too late for that:
> > Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Did anyone actually bother to review it? It's huge and was in
> > > pretty bad shapre when I looked last time. Also in the -mm merge
> > > writeup you guys said it's only scheduled for 2.6.19 so I didn't
> > > even bother looking at the huge mess.
:-)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
