Re: list corruption on removal of snd_seq_dummy

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 12:47:46PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
 
 > > The code in question is doing..
 > > 
 > >         __list_add(&deleted_list,
 > >                client->ports_list_head.prev,
 > >                client->ports_list_head.next);
 > > 
 > > which looks fishy, as those two elements aren't going to be consecutive,
 > > as __list_add expects.
 > 
 > I think the code behaves correctly but probably misusing __list_add().
 > It movies the whole entries from an existing list_head A
 > (clients->ports_list_head) to a new list_head B (deleted_list).
 > The above is exapnded:
 > 
 > 	A->next->prev = B;
 > 	B->next = A->next;
 > 	B->prev = A->prev;
 > 	A->prev->next = B;
 > 
 > Any better way to achieve it using standard macros?

Why can't you just list_move() the elements ?

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/