Re: Bug in 2.6.17 / mdadm 2.5.1

On Monday June 26, [email protected] wrote:
> Neil Brown wrote:
> <snip>
> > Alternately you can apply the following patch to the kernel and
> > version-1 superblocks should work better.
> 
> -stable material?

Maybe.  I'm not sure it exactly qualifies, but I might try sending it
to them and see what they think.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Bug in 2.6.17 / mdadm 2.5.1
    • From: Ronald Lembcke <[email protected]>
  • Re: Bug in 2.6.17 / mdadm 2.5.1
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: Bug in 2.6.17 / mdadm 2.5.1
    • From: Andre Tomt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix softirq accounting with 4K stacks
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 2/2] x86_64 PCI: improve extended config space verification
• Previous by thread: Re: Bug in 2.6.17 / mdadm 2.5.1
• Next by thread: [PATCH] swsuspend breakage in 2.6.17-git
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]