On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 03:49:45AM -0700, Mike Grundy wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 10:09:10AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > After reading your notes it's probably overkill doing the cs on each cpu, since
> > > the interrupt will discard the prefetched instructions.
> >
> > Indeed. Another thing that should not be forgotten: it could be that the
> > whole kernel text segment resides in a shared read only segment. So it can
> > be shared by multiple z/VM guests.
> > In that case the cs instruction will fail. Looks like you need to write the
> > part that replaces the instruction in assembly and supply a fixup section
> > which in turn makes sure that -EFAULT is returned.
>
> If it fails, won't it will generate a program interrupt, 5 (access exception)?
Yes, that's why you need a fixup section :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
