On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 20:42 +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> I just booted with both patches applied, mine and Mike's, and that
> actually makes a difference in hardirq cpu time accounting. With my
> patch only, hi is 0 in top while the box gets a ping flood. With both
> patches, I get about 1% hi. Mike's patch causes update_process_times()
> to be called twice on UP, but that alone shouldn't change the
> percentages, right?
Yes, you definitely need to comment out the other call if you test the
SMP path on UP+IO-APIC.
> OTOH top shows "hi" as zero with 8K stacks as well unless Mike's patch
> is applied, so the results with Mike's patch are bogus (if so, why?) or
> hardirq accounting is broken in general.
Something is certainly still b0rken. I still get three different
answers to the question "what is my cpu usage" depending on
configuration. With stock UP kernel with no IO-APIC, interrupt load is
all hi. With your patch and IO-APIC, it's all si. SMP shows a mix of
both.
I like the result of using the SMP path if you have an IO-APIC best,
though I haven't verified them against a profile for accuracy. Taking a
peek at the profile confirms that it is indeed mixed, so anything
showing the load as being either hi or si has to be wrong.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
