On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 15:01 +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> commit c22ce143d15eb288543fe9873e1c5ac1c01b69a1
> tree dc7d457b8952fc50dfc90df659b35de4117c61fc
> parent 7dbdf43cfa635ddc3701cc8d1eab07597cd731c0
> author Hiro Yoshioka <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:04:16 -0700
> committer Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:42:56 -0700
>
> [PATCH] x86: cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
>
> Use the x86 cache-bypassing copy instructions for copy_from_user().
>
> Some performance data are
>
> Total of GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS (CPU cycle samples)
>
> 2.6.12.4.orig 1921587
> 2.6.12.4.nt 1599424
> 1599424/1921587=83.23% (16.77% reduction)
Hi,
while this patch will reduce the number of cycles spent in the kernel,
it's just pushing the cache miss to userspace (by virtue of doing a
cache flush effectively)... is this really the right thing? The total
memory bandwidth will actually increase with this patch if you're
unlucky (eg if userspace decides to write to this memory eventually)....
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
