On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 03:36:28 -0400
Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:52:04 -0400
> >Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Convert locking used within taskstats interface and delay accounting
> >>code to be more fine-grained.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >This patch is based on
> >per-task-delay-accounting-taskstats-interface-fix-exit-race-in-per-task-delay-accounting.patch,
> >which I've noted as `nacked' but didn't drop.
> >
> >So I guess that's now un-nacked?
> >
> >
> Not in intent. This patch reverses all the changes made by that patch.
> So effectively the previous patch is still nacked.
> However, I based this patch on the previous one because you hadn't
> dropped the latter (so we're going round in circles !)
>
> How about I just send one patch that covers the whole locking thing ?
>
Is OK - I'll concatenate these:
per-task-delay-accounting-taskstats-interface-fix-exit-race-in-per-task-delay-accounting.patch
per-task-delay-accounting-delay-accounting-usage-of-taskstats-interface.patch
per-task-delay-accounting-delay-accounting-usage-of-taskstats-interface-use-portable-cputime-api-in-__delayacct_add_tsk.patch
per-task-delay-accounting-delay-accounting-usage-of-taskstats-interface-fix-return-value-of-delayacct_add_tsk.patch
revised-locking-for-taskstats-interface.patch
into a single
per-task-delay-accounting-delay-accounting-usage-of-taskstats-interface.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
