Re: Measuring tools - top and interrupts

Danial Thom <[email protected]> :
[...]
> What's *fun* about it? 2.4.24 shows a 12-13%
> load. 

The assumption of linearity.

[...]
> > No difference when you renice ksoftirqd to a
> > strongly
> > negative value ?
> 
> No, not really. Running the compiler causes
> drops. re-nicing eliminates drops with no
> userland activity.

It may be interesting to know if the same drops
happen when you generate a disk-only load, ksoftirqd
still at the minimal value.

-- 
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Measuring tools - top and interrupts
    • From: Francois Romieu <[email protected]>
  • Re: Measuring tools - top and interrupts
    • From: Danial Thom <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Patch][RFC] Disabling per-tgid stats on task exit in taskstats
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ext3_clear_inode(): avoid kfree(NULL)
• Previous by thread: Re: Measuring tools - top and interrupts
• Next by thread: Re: Measuring tools - top and interrupts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]