Hi,
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 08:31:04PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> > Fixes a "static qualifier follows non-static qualifier" error from gcc 4.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
>
> Broken. Proper fix is to rename the function so that it wouldn't clash.
Well, I wouldn't call it broken, as both versions can never be compiled
into the same kernel, but I don't care much how it's fixed.
Does anyone know the relationship between via-pmu.c and via-pmu68k.c? If
it's intended to keep the differences small, a rename would be the wrong
fix.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
